|

Susan G. Zieff
Graduate Coordinator & Associate Professor of Kinesiology
Ph.D.
University of California, Berkeley
At SF State since 1997
Research Interests
Physical activity behavior and disparities in physical
activity opportunities among ethnic minorities and within economically
disadvantaged populations. I utilize qualitative methodology and
community-based participatory research to understand the ways in which
disparities influence participants' experiences with physical activity.
Contact
Susan G. Zieff, Ph.D.
Department of Kinesiology,
GYM 136
San Francisco State University
1600 Holloway Ave
San Francisco, CA 94132
Tel: (415) 338-6574
susangz@sfsu.edu
|
Physical Activity Knowledge
And Behavior:
A Survey Of San Francisco
Adults
INTRODUCTION
Background
Regular participation in moderate and vigorous
physical activity has been associated with reduced
risk of cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of
death and disability among U.S. adults (Wang, et al,
2004). Medical costs from treating cardiovascular
and chronic diseases such as diabetes are estimated
at more than US$ 76.6 billion, with spending at over
US$ 5 billion for health conditions resulting from
inactive lifestyles (Pratt, et al, 2002).
Cardiovascular and chronic diseases
disproportionately affect African American men and
women (Bassett, et al, 2002; Ferdinand, 2006),
Latinos (Lerman-Garber, et al, 2004), and
economically disadvantaged groups, including many
minorities (Liburd, et al, 2006; Henderson and
Ainsworth, 2000; Petersen, et al, 2006). In
addition, inadequate physical activity has been
implicated in the high prevalence of obesity-and its
associated health consequences-among ethnic minority
groups (Kumanyika, 1994).
Research suggests that lack of knowledge of the
benefits of physical activity remains one barrier to
participation in health promotion programs (Chinn,
et al, 2006). Community-based educational programs have been found to increase knowledge about health
and physical activity and in intentions to be
physically active and have been recommended as an
effective strategy for promoting physical activity
by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services,
a Division of the Centers for Disease Control (Task
Force, 2002). However, few community-based physical
activity interventions adequately consider the
specific needs and interests of local populations,
sometimes resulting in high numbers of “non-
participants” thereby reducing possible health
benefits (Chinn, et al, 2006).
Recent research has focused on the relationship
between the built environment and physical activity
behavior; facilities conveniently located near home
are used by more respondents than facilities located
elsewhere (Giles-Corti & Donovan, 2002).Yet,
minority populations often have reduced access to
physical activity facilities and programs, and these
disparities have been linked with lower rates of
engagement in health-related leisure time physical
activity (Ahmed, et al, 2005; Liao, et al, 2004),
higher overweight patterns (Gordon-Larsen, et al,
2006), and body mass index, an important general
health indicator (Robert & Reither, 2004) than for
white populations. African Americans, for example,
also underestimate the extent of their overweight,
and therefore their risk for cardiovascular disease
(Bennett, et al, 2006). However, the social and
contextual correlates of physical activity behavior
among minority and disadvantaged populations remain
under-explored (Fleury & Lee, 2006; Wolin, et al,
2006).
To increase physical activity involvement and reduce
the rate of non-participation that results from lack
of appropriate programming, particularly as it is
experienced by ethnic minorities, a survey of local
community interests and physical activity behavior
would be useful. At this time, local communities
must assume the responsibility for providing health
-benefiting physical activity programs and
assessment as there is no national plan for
targeting physical activity as a strategy for
reducing chronic disease risk factors (CDC, 2005;
Yancey, et al, 2004). In addition, California is not
yet involved with the State Plan Index, a project in
which CDC and state public health experts guide and
assess physical activity, nutrition, and obesity
program planning in states receiving CDC funds.
Objective of this Project
Currently there are no data that describe in detail,
the physical activity behavior of San Francisco
adults by neighborhood, socioeconomic status, race
and ethnicity, and other demographic markers. The
purpose of this project is to assess and develop a
detailed map of the physical activity behavior of
the adult population of San Francisco with specific
attention to African Americans, Asians (selected
groups for which CHIS health data is available
including Chinese, Filipino, Korean, and Vietnamese
adults), and Latinos. An assessment of attitudes
towards and held knowledge about the health benefits
of physical activity will also be conducted to gain
further understanding about the respondents’
physical activity practices. This information is
important to the development of demographically
appropriate programs, facilities, and policies to
improve health-related physical activity behavior
among this city’s diverse population.
Hypothesis: Economically disadvantaged individuals
will report limited knowledge about the health
benefits of physical activity.
Hypothesis: Racial and ethnic inequalities in
socioeconomic position will contribute to racial and
ethnic disparities in health-benefiting physical
activity behavior.
Hypothesis: Ethnic minorities and economically
disadvantaged individuals who report chronic health
conditions will also report lower levels of physical
activity.
Hypothesis: Ethnic minorities and economically
disadvantaged individuals will experience greater
numbers and types of barriers (e.g. environmental
and resource) to engaging in physical activity.
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
This project applies the “ecological” model that
identifies the intrapersonal, social environment,
and physical environment factors that influence
physical activity behavior (Sallis and Owen, 1997),
although this model has been applied in limited ways
toward understanding physical activity behavior of
minority populations (Fleury and Lee, 2006).
There are two phases to the project:
Phase I will be the development of a survey tool
through the use of citizen focus groups. The members
of each focus group will review a set of established
questions about physical activity knowledge and
behavior (e.g. selected from the International
Physical Activity Questionnaire and other
appropriate sources, Pardini, et al, 2001), for
relevance, scope, and cultural sensitivity.
Assessing the extent to which adults participate in
health-related physical activity is difficult;
survey questions often lack sensitivity to ethnic
group behavior differences and definitions of
“health-related physical activity” vary widely.
During Phase II, the survey tool developed and
validated by the focus groups will be mailed to
adults selected according to the stratification
methodology used in constructing the focus groups.
It is anticipated that Phase II will be conducted as
a joint project between the Survey Research Center
and the Public Research Institute of San Francisco
State University. A database will be created from
the responses to the survey to:
-
Develop a “map” detailing physical activity
behavior among San Francisco adults to identify
differences by neighborhood, socioeconomic status,
gender, ethnicity, age, and other demographic
markers;
-
Develop an inventory of public and private
facilities and resources used by residents for
physical activity;
-
Analyze the physical activity behavior of
this population in relation to expressed knowledge
of its health benefits, chronic health conditions
experienced by respondents, and articulation of
specific barriers, including environmental, to
engagement.
References
Bassett DR, Fitzhugh EC, Crespo CJ, King GA,
McLaughlin JE. Physical activity and ethnic
differences in hypertension prevalence in the United
States. Preventive Medicine. 2002;34:179-186.
Bennett GG, Wolin KY, Goodman M, Samplin-Salgado M,
Carter P, Dutton S, Hill R, Emmons K. Attitudes
regarding overweight, exercise, and health among
Blacks (United States). Cancer Causes and Control.
2006;17:95-101.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Overweight and obesity: State-based programs.
Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity,
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion. 2005.
http://www.cdc.gov/NCCdphp/dnpa/obesity/state_programs/index.htm
Chinn DJ, White M, Howel D, Harland JO, Drinkwater
CK. Factors associated with non-participation in a
physical activity promotion trial. Public Health.
2006;120(4):309-19.
Ferdinand KC. Coronary artery disease in minority
racial and ethnic groups in the United States.
American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;97[suppl]:12A-
19A.
Fleury J, Lee SM. The social ecological model and
physical activity in African American women.
American Journal of Community Psychology. 2006;37
(1/2):129-140.
Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. The relative influence of
individual, social and physical environment
determinants of physical activity. Social Science &
Medicine. 2002;54:1793-1812.
Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM.
Inequality in the built environment underlies key
health disparities in physical activity and obesity.
Pediatrics. 2006;117(2):417-24.
Henderson KA, Ainsworth BE. Sociocultural
perspectives on physical activity in the lives of
older African American and American Indian women: A
cross cultural activity participation study. Women
Health. 2000;31(1):1-20.
http://www.chis.ucla.edu/rc/default.asp
Kumanyika SK. Obesity in minority populations: an
epidemiologic assessment. Obes Res. 1994;2(2):166-
82.
Lerman-Garber I, Villa AR, Caballero E. Diabetes and
cardiovascular disease. Is there a true Hispanic
paradox? Rev Invest Clin. 2004;56(3):282-96.
Liburd LC, Giles HW, Mensah GA. Looking through a
glass, darkly: Eliminating health disparities. Prev
Chronic Dis. 2006.
http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/jul/05_0209.htm.
Pratt M, Macera CA, Wang G. Higher direct medical
costs associated with physical inactivity. The
Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2000;28(10):1-12.
Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models. In: Glanz K,
Lewis FM and Rimer Bk, ed. Health Behavior and
Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 2nd
ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997:403-424.
Task Force on Community Preventive Services (CDC).
Recommendations to increase physical activity in
communities. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine. 2002;22(4S):67-72.
Wang G, Pratt M, Macera CA, Zheng ZJ, Heath G.
Physical activity, cardiovascular disease, and
medical expenditures in U.S. adults. Ann Behav Med.
2004;28(2):88-94.
Yancey AK, Kumanyika SK, Ponce NA, McCarthy WJ,
Fielding JE, Leslie JP, Akbar J. Population-based
interventions engaging communities of color in
healthy eating and active living: a review.
Preventing Chronic Disease. 2004;1(1):A09.
Mentor
|